gal.patheticcockroach.com

Just a picture gallery I quickly set up as a replacement for my Photobucket account.
Have fun! (yes, most pictures are funny ones, or try to be)
Also, there is a couple of tiny ads below, whitelist me maybe? ;)

[ stop the slideshow ]

The pyramid of denial

pyramid_of_denial.png The illusion of free choiceThumbnailsThere's science in this shitThe illusion of free choiceThumbnailsThere's science in this shitThe illusion of free choiceThumbnailsThere's science in this shit

There are many kinds of denial, and some of them suck. I don't totally agree with the order chosen in this pyramid, but I suppose it's still a good basis for thinking:
- negative affect: getting angry, irritated, or upset. I wouldn't place it at the lowest level because at least it doesn't involve being an ass to your interlocutor
- source derogation: insulting the source, dismissing their expertise or trustworthiness, or otherwise rejecting their validity
- selective exposure: leaving the situation or tuning out the persuasive message
- assertions of confidence: "nothing/noone could change my position"
- social validation: "Einstein said that too so I'm right and you're wrong"
- message distortion: selectively processing or understanding a persuasive message in a way that favors one's original attitude. That should be at the bottom along with selective exposure, IMO, those attitudes are just the best way to turn an interesting discussion into a stupid dialogue of the deaf.
- attitude bolstering: presenting arguments for one's position without responding to the arguments presented
- counter-arguing: actually responding to arguments. Congrats for reaching the top!

Visits since 15 September 2016:

Flag counter