Just a picture gallery I quickly set up as a replacement for my Photobucket account.
Have fun! (yes, most pictures are funny ones, or try to be)
Also, there is a couple of tiny ads below, whitelist me maybe? ;)

Home / Keyword arguments /

The pyramid of denial

pyramid_of_denial.png I didn't read the article, but...ThumbnailsI didn't read the article, but...ThumbnailsI didn't read the article, but...Thumbnails

There are many kinds of denial, and some of them suck. I don't totally agree with the order chosen in this pyramid, but I suppose it's still a good basis for thinking:
- negative affect: getting angry, irritated, or upset. I wouldn't place it at the lowest level because at least it doesn't involve being an ass to your interlocutor
- source derogation: insulting the source, dismissing their expertise or trustworthiness, or otherwise rejecting their validity
- selective exposure: leaving the situation or tuning out the persuasive message
- assertions of confidence: "nothing/noone could change my position"
- social validation: "Einstein said that too so I'm right and you're wrong"
- message distortion: selectively processing or understanding a persuasive message in a way that favors one's original attitude. That should be at the bottom along with selective exposure, IMO, those attitudes are just the best way to turn an interesting discussion into a stupid dialogue of the deaf.
- attitude bolstering: presenting arguments for one's position without responding to the arguments presented
- counter-arguing: actually responding to arguments. Congrats for reaching the top!

44 KB
arguments, denial


Visits since 15 September 2016:

Flag counter